Ultimate Open House


Legend Homes wins two national silver awards

January 26, 2010

Legend Homes was honored by the National Association of Home Builders with two silver Sales and Marketing Awards for the company’s television and radio advertisements, both designed to promote Legend’s new EarthSmart homes.

The television and radio ads feature L.E.S. (Legend EarthSmart), a talking home that explains Legend’s new goal of creating smaller, affordable homes employing state-of-the-art building practices coupled with the company’s strong focus on energy and resource conservation. The ads were created in conjunction with Art4orm.

To watch the award-winning commercials, go to:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vu_yWKFdc_8


Workshop explains LEED for homes green building program

January 8, 2010

Filed under: Builder's Corner, Building Science, Green — uoh @ 4:17 pm

Homeowners and building industry professionals are invited to attend a workshop on Thursday that offers an introduction to the LEED for Homes program, a leading environmental building certification standard.

LEED, or Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, was started in 2000 and initially was used in the construction of office buildings. But the LEED for Homes program is tailored to the needs of single-family construction, promoting the design of buildings with low energy and water bills, reduced carbon emissions and healthier indoor air quality than found in standard construction methods.

Randy Hansell, Senior Green Building Consultant for Earth Advantage Inc., will lead the session.

The workshop will be held on Thursday from 8 to 10 a.m. at Earth Advantage National Center, 16280 S.W. Upper Boones Ferry Rd. The class costs $20 for the public, or $10 for active Earth Advantage builders and some others in the green building industry. Advance registration online or by phone is requested.

For more information, contact education@earthadvantage.org or 503-968-7160 x18.


Public Transportation Not a Big Factor Behind Housing Choices

December 22, 2009

Filed under: Builder's Corner, Building Science — uoh @ 11:41 pm

Without a major shift in public attitudes toward using public transportation and driving less, there are limits to how far new public transportation systems and transit-oriented development can go in reducing traffic flow on local streets and highways, according to new research by economists at NAHB.

Relatively few home buyers and renters choose a neighborhood because of its proximity to public transportation, the study found.

Based on data from the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the U.S. Census Bureau, the NAHB study on “Household Type, Housing Choice and Commuting Behavior” found that relatively few married couples with children consider public transportation when selecting a neighborhood, and that they are likely to own more cars and travel more miles to work than other types of households.

Married couples, the research showed, are more likely to settle in a particular neighborhood because they like its appearance or it’s the location of a home they particularly like. One-person households, on the other hand, care about finding a location near where they work more than anything else.

Economists at NAHB note that these results have implications for land use planning — suggesting, for example, that different types of housing are needed to serve different types of households, and that the appropriate mix of housing in a transit-oriented development may differ from the mix needed to serve the local labor market as a whole.

The Size of City Blocks

Focusing on another aspect of the built environment, the study investigated the relationship between commuting patterns and the size of city blocks.

In the absence of other types of consistently complied data, block size is routinely used by academic researchers to measure street accessibility and interconnectivity.

Tracts with the smallest blocks — and therefore, at least theoretically, the best connected and most accessible streets — have the highest percentage of people walking and bicycling to work, according to the research. However, under the best of circumstances, cyclists and walkers never exceed 10% of the commuting population.

Smaller blocks also lead to shorter commuting times, the data suggested; at least until the average block size falls to 50,000 square feet. When blocks are smaller than that, the trend is reversed and commuting time starts to increase.

The study concluded that commuting times are longest in tracts with an average block size of under 20,000 square feet, indicating that there are limits on how small it would be desirable to make blocks in new residential developments.


“Green” Certified Homes Sell for More in Portland Market

July 9, 2009

Filed under: Building Science, Green, Your Home Your Money — uoh @ 5:12 am

The growth in the number of “green” certified homes in the Portland metro region is attracting some significant attention.  Over the past year, three percent of all new homes sold in the Portland Metropolitan Area carried a sustainable or “green” certification brand. These homes earned more in the market than non-certified homes, selling for an average price of $223 per square foot, versus $185 per square foot for non-certified, traditionally built homes.

This information was compiled by the Regional Multiple Listing Service (RMLS) in Portland.  The percentage quoted includes new home sales in Multnomah, Clackamas, Columbia, Washington and Yamhill Counties.  It does not include new home sales in Clark County, WA.  RMLS began tracking the sale of green certified homes in 2007 when the certification search feature was implemented on the MLS database.

“Green” certified homes also sold faster than homes without certification.  New “green” homes in the Portland Metro Area remained on the market for just of 66 days on average, while the average time on the market for all homes was 73 days.

“These findings are very important,” states Sean Penrith, Executive Director of the not-for-profit Earth Advantage, Inc. “We have long heard and touted that green building is the right thing to do, and it is. But now we have actual data that points to higher value for green homes and reduced time on the market. This is the tipping point, and in five years, builders that are not identifying green in their practices will undoubtedly be marginalized.”

“Green” certification includes third-party certified Earth Advantage® homes, Earth Advantage/ENERGY STAR® co-labeled homes, ENERGY STAR, and LEED® for Homes.  For the period ending April 30, 2008, 309 housing units in the study received either Earth Advantage or an Earth Advantage/ ENERGY STAR certification.  To obtain third-party certification, a builder or developer works with Earth Advantage, Inc to ensure that the highest standards for energy efficiency, indoor air quality, resource efficiency, water conservation and environmental responsibility are integrated into the construction of the home. Final performance testing and inspections are conducted by Earth Advantage, Inc. before a certificate of compliance is issued.

Home builders in the region are offering “green” or sustainable amenities as a way to compete in the housing market.  Such features include efficient home furnaces and high performance heating and ventilation systems.  Steve Tapio is the Building Science Team Leader for New Tradition Homes in Vancouver.  His company began offering Earth Advantage certified homes in 2005. “All builders need to be in the running now,” Tapio reported.  “The cost of energy is one of the largest concerns on the consumer’s mind.  Sustainable features are also of interest in this market.”

“Green” built homes are designed with people in mind.  They are more energy efficient reducing monthly utility costs, have healthier indoor in qualities that are better for occupants, and have more durable features and products that reduce time and money for upkeep.  People are acknowledging these traits as not only core values to themselves, but are also beginning to understand how “green” built homes truly make sense, from an economic and environmental perspective.


On The Go With Joe: Ultimate Open House

April 16, 2009

kptv

Energy Trust of Oregon

Energy Trust of Oregon

NW Natural

NW Natural


Energy Efficient Accreditations

April 7, 2009

energy-efficency


Metro Nature in Neighborhood

April 3, 2009

Low impact development practices not only protect water quality and keep local streams and rivers healthy for people, fish and wildlife but can raise property values. Consumers, developers and builders recognize the value of green building practices – as evidenced by the 23 homes and five condominiums showcased at the Ultimate Open House that feature low impact development practices. Look for Metro’s Nature in Neighborhoods signs that designate these homes as nature friendly.

One of the featured homes, Green Hammer Construction’s “The Greenest of Them All…”, uses several low impact development practices, including rain gardens, sheet mulching, native plants, creek restoration and preserving mature trees. Metro’s Nature in Neighborhoods staff provide resource workshops and materials on these and other low impact development practices. Look for the Green from the Ground Up information on the Metro web site at www.oregonmetro.gov/development


Meet your current and future needs

February 2, 2009

Filed under: Building Science — uoh @ 9:59 pm

Why should you think about accessibility issues when buying a new house? Accessibility features help you age in place, create a welcoming home for older or disabled family and friends, and many features may cost less when done at the time of original construction.

Accessibility features to consider are…

  • Makeing all doors 3 feet wide
  • Minimum width of hallways 42 inches
  • No, or low profile thresholds
  • Easy to reach electrical wall outlets
  • Low maintennce landscaping
  • Covered entryway
  • Varied countertop/workspace heights
  • Main floor bedroom and bath placement


Concrete Is Sustainable, Durable — and Green

December 10, 2008

Filed under: Builder's Corner, Building Science, Green — uoh @ 4:18 pm

Concrete is one of the single most environmentally friendly construction products available. It offers stability, durability and design flexibility for the residential marketplace and environmental advantages through every stage of manufacturing and use.

And it offers sustainability. Because old concrete can be recycled it can be reused almost indefinitely.

The following are concrete’s primary environmental benefits:

Created From an Abundance of Raw MaterialsConcrete draws upon some of the earth’s most common and abundant minerals for its raw materials.

Portland cement, which makes up about 12% of concrete, is manufactured from limestone, clay and sand. Sources of aggregates used to make concrete — sand gravel and crushed stone — are plentiful. In addition, aggregate can contain recycled materials such as slag, a by-product of steel manufacturing. Also, when using Portland cement, a portion of it can be replaced with fly ash, a by-product of coal-burning power plants, and similar materials.

Fuel to Produce Concrete Can Come From the Waste Stream

The process of making cement also can use recycled materials. High-energy wastes such as old tires can be used as fuel in the cement-making process. One million old tires can fuel a single cement kiln for a year — conserving fossil fuels and keeping old tires out of landfills.

Other recycled waste used in the production of cement can include used motor oil, disposable diapers, industrial solvents and sludge.

Local Production Reduces Transportation Costs and Fuel

Cement and concrete supplies are highly local or regional. At least 60% of all concrete is produced within 100 miles of the construction site where it is used. Wood and steel products, on the other hand, typically have to be transported hundreds or, sometimes, a thousand miles or more to the job site.

Concrete’s Thermal Mass Yields Energy Savings

The thermal mass of concrete buildings and homes reduces temperature swings — and can save owners energy year-round.

During the air-conditioning season, for instance, a concrete building generally only will require the cooling system to be in operation at night — during off-peak hours when electric companies can produce power more efficiently.

Also, many of today’s concrete wall systems, such as insulating concrete forms (ICFs), combine the mass of concrete with foam insulation — creating an exterior wall envelope that through thermal mass, reduced air infiltration and increased R-value can reduce heating and cooling costs by as much as 40%.

Concrete Reduces Construction Waste Because Fewer Components Are Needed

Concrete construction requires fewer kinds of building products — such as sheathing and insulation —than wood-frame construction. Plus, concrete is created on an “as needed” basis, eliminating the waste inherent in sheet goods and dimensional products for framing.

Because fewer materials are needed, building with concrete puts less waste in landfills. And if replacement or demolition is required, old concrete can be ground up and reused as coarse aggregate or pavement sub-base material.

Concrete’s Durability Can Weather Time and the Weather

Concrete does not rust, rot or burn, so housing stock built with concrete components such as wall systems can stand for generations.

Concrete is less susceptible to moisture damage and can generally “breathe” and dry — if the concrete structure is not too close to adjacent structures. Concrete driveways will far outlast their asphalt competitors, while items such as fiber-cement siding are much more durable than competing cladding materials. By simply outlasting other materials, concrete conserves energy and resources.

In addition, homes built with concrete also are more likely to withstand natural disasters such as hurricanes, tornados and fires than traditional wood-frame housing stock.

Concrete Homes Can Create a Healthier Indoor Environment

Concrete can promote a healthier indoor atmosphere because it is practically inert and requires no volatile organic-based preservatives.

The solid concrete walls in homes built with exterior concrete framing systems serve as a continuous barrier against air infiltration, which can greatly reduce the level of airborne dust and allergens when a fresh air exchanger and humidifier are used.

Concrete Homes Are Increasing in Popularity

From 1999 through 2005, the share of homes built with concrete walls increased from 5.9% to 17.9%. This increase not only measures a growing popularity in concrete homes, but a change in attitudes as well.

Not many years ago, the idea of building a concrete home generated blank stares among potential home owners or prompted questions about why anyone would want to do such a thing.

Now, however, many consumers are aware of this type of construction, understand its benefits and want to know how much it will cost and where to find the nearest supplier or builder.

A combination of factors is driving these changes in perception and attitude — a rise in energy prices, an increase in the amount and destructiveness of natural disasters and the rise of the green building movement.

Aesthetically, the Depth of the Windowsill Tells the Tale

While growing in popularity, many people still have the mistaken perception that a concrete home looks more like a bunker or fallout shelter than a home.

Aesthetically, however, with most concrete wall systems in use today, it’s difficult to drive down a street and pick out which home is concrete. Concrete home exteriors are finished with siding, stucco, brick and stone, just like wood-frame construction.

Also, like with wood-frame construction, the interior of a concrete home is finished with drywall, though with some systems such as precast concrete, interior walls are simply painted.

For both outdoor and indoor areas, decorative concrete is rapidly growing in popularity for all types of home construction. Traditional concrete flatwork can be stained, stamped, stenciled or polished to achieve a wide variety of patterns, colors and textures. Beautiful custom concrete countertops can achieve a similar range of styles.

So what’s the primary aesthetic difference between concrete homes and wood-frame construction? Simply put, the walls of a concrete home are thicker.

But the only way to tell the difference on a finished home is by the greater depth of the windowsill of a concrete home — which is a definite bonus in the eyes of many home owners.


Even churches are going green

November 13, 2008

Filed under: Building Science, Green, Portland Style — uoh @ 7:36 pm

From Green Source Magazine, By David Sokol

Hennebery Eddy’s parking garage for the historic First Presbyterian Church in downtown Portland. Completed in 2007, the 170-spot structure burrows three levels below grade adjacent to the church, and its intensive green roof allows partial public access.

When church members purchased the neglected four-story building that sits where the garage is located today, they had envisioned planting a lawn on the roof. But the community didn’t have green design in mind originally. The structure was necessary for older congregants and families to participate in various church services, and the grass merely a placeholder for above-ground building expansion.

Eddy says the client began thinking greener, because his firm convinced the church that those features dovetail perfectly with its concern for “practical, thoughtful solutions that last long, are efficient, and don’t cost a lot to operate.” Materials are durable, ceilings painted white reflect light and reduce the number of fluorescent lamps installed by approximately 15 percent, a second-generation elevator saves energy, and ventilation turns on only when carbon monoxide sensors trip the switch.

The garden itself is designed to highlight the rose window that had been hidden by the four-story neighbor. Lawns, which the church daycare program uses, are framed by walking paths and boxwood, and furniture nestled into the garden’s sawtooth edge activates the public sidewalk. Hardscaping is graded so that stormwater drains toward planted spaces, although heavy precipitation travels to flow-through planters and stormwater vaults.

“Design the experience for the people who are going to be using it, and design the way it fits into the city,” Eddy says. “Then make the cars fit in the most efficient way you possibly can.”

Older Posts »